Carta em protesto às execuções na Indonésia

18 de maio, 2015 Ceballos93 carta aberta Indonésia Pena de Morte Permalink

A Plataforma assinou recentemente uma carta aberta em protesto às execuções pelo governo da Indonésia, mostrando preocupação pelo uso da pena de morte em crimes não violentos como o porte de drogas.

Além da preocupação com as execuções que vitimaram mais de 40 pessoas, o documento assinado por 41 grupos, pede restrição do governo norte-americano ao financiamento e apoio de leis e governos que determinem a pena de morte por crimes não violentos.

Confira a carta abaixo:

We, the undersigned US organizations, international organizations that do work in the US, and supporting organizations in other countries, write to express our grave concern over Indonesia’s execution of Marco Archer Cardoso Moreira (Brazil), Ang Kiem Soei (Netherlands), Daniel Enemuo (Nigeria), Namaona Denis (Malawi), Rani Andriani (Indonesia), Tran Thi Bich Hanh (Vietnam), Martin Anderson alias Belo (Ghana), Raheem Agbaje Salami (Nigeria), Okwudili Oyatanze (Nigeria), Rodrigo Gularte (Brazil), Myuran Sukumaran (Australia), Andrew Chan (Australia), Zainal Abidin (Indonesia), Silvester Obikwe (Nigeria), and for more than 40 other prisoners remaining on Indonesia’s death row for drug offenses.
As organizations concerned with US programs and policy, we further relate our concern that the US may inadvertently contribute to executions by extending counternarcotics assistance and cooperation to countries that apply the death penalty for nonviolent offenses. Assisting any government in a manner that leads to violations of the basic human rights of its citizens and foreign nationals is at odds with US values.
Unfortunately while these Indonesian prisoners are currently the most-publicized cases of drug-related government executions, similar executions occur in other countries as well, with little to no international outcry. For example, it was recently report that eight Iranians were hanged for drug offenses as well. Reports indicate that Indonesia’s death row includes individuals who were low-level participants in the trade and suffered from addiction or mental illness.
Wherever they occur, executions for nonviolent offenses violate human rights. The United Nations has called for the gradual abolition of the death penalty , but has particularly opposed its application to nonviolent offenses. The UN Office on Drugs and Crime noted in a 2010 document that “the use of the death penalty for those convicted solely of drug-related or economic offenses raises grave human rights concerns.” In 2011, the UN High Commissioner for Human Rights wrote that “use of the death penalty for nonviolent acts… constitutes a violation of international human rights law,” specifically citing Article 6 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights. In the United States, a country that retains the death penalty, the Eighth Amendment to the Constitution (no “cruel and unusual punishments”) has been ruled to preclude the imposition of the death penalty for nonviolent offenses.
Indonesian organizations have also argued that executions for drug offenses damage rather than protect the public’s health. In a January Open Letter to Pres. Joko Widodo, over 30 NGOs wrote, “[T]he death penalty and executions [authorized in legislation passed in 1997] ha[ve] failed to lower the crime rate [or] to reduce the… number of addicts or drug users in Indonesia… [E]xecutions [of] illicit [drug] trafficking offenders [are] actually detrimental to the community [of] addicts [because] big drug dealers… continue to seek, find and exploit other vulnerable individuals who are forced to become… drug courier[s].”
Although the impact of US foreign assistance in leading to death penalty executions for nonviolent offenses remains to be assessed, a 2014 report found that assistance provided by European governments to Iranian and Pakistani law enforcement agencies was linked to more than 3,000 death sentences in those countries. The report noted that the governments of Denmark, Ireland and the United Kingdom, had withdrawn funding for supply side anti-drug operations in Iran, and that Denmark’s Trade and Development Minister had stated that “the donations are leading to executions.” It is likely that US law enforcement assistance to countries with the death penalty for drug offenses contributes to executions for nonviolent offenses as well.
When, on January 18, Indonesia began executing the 64 drug prisoners on death row for drug offenses, a number of governments recalled their ambassadors from Indonesia, and have since expressed their condemnation of Indonesia’s policy. Additionally, attorneys have charged that Pres. Joko Widodo has violated Indonesia’s clemency statute by failing to give individual consideration to these defendants’ clemency petitions. In February, UN Secretary General Ban Ki Moon urged Indonesian Pres. Widodo to halt the executions. Meanwhile, however, the US has remained silent.
Accordingly, we call on the US State and Justice Departments to:
• urge Indonesia, and other countries as appropriate, to halt executions for nonviolent offenses, and other countries as appropriate;
• investigate whether US intelligence or other assistance – as provided by the DEA’s Jakarta Country Office, established in 2011 , and other US agencies – has contributed to the incarceration of defendants on Indonesia’s death row or that of other countries;
• condition US assistance and cooperation on an agreement that the recipient government will not impose the death penalty for nonviolent offenses in cases in which US resources may have aided in the capture or prosecution of a defendant, with appropriate safeguards and verification procedures by both the US and recipient government; and
• establish procedures to ensure not only that US law enforcement and intelligence agencies consistently respect international human rights norms in their operations, but that US assistance provided to other countries’ agencies also do not support or foster human rights violations.
We acknowledge the complexity of factors that involved in international relations, and we recognize that Indonesia is a strategic US partner in the region. Nevertheless, the US has an obligation to take the moral high ground on this issue, by leveraging its considerable influence as a partner to encourage Indonesia and other countries to move away from draconian punishments and toward a more humane justice system. At a minimum the US should address the role that our international law enforcement presence may contribute to disproportionate and rights-abusing criminal justice policies abroad.